JMM Special Issue Call for Papers: Deadline for submissions has now passed

Influencer Marketing: Interdisciplinary and Socio-Cultural Perspectives.

Guest Editors: Lauren Gurrieri, RMIT University, Australia, Jenna Drenten, Loyola University Chicago, USA, & Crystal Abidin, Curtin University, Australia

Influencer marketing is a growing area of interest both inside and outside of the academy. Brands are increasingly devoting their marketing budgets to influencer marketing, with the industry valued at $8 billion in 2019 and expected to grow up to $15 billion by 2022 (Business Insider, 2019). Social media provides a megaphone for influencers (McQuarrie et al., 2013). To date most influencer research has focused on Instagram (Abidin 2014, 2016a, 2016b; Campana et al., 2020; Drenten et al., 2020), however there are a varied and growing number of platforms that warrant examination, including TikTok and Cameo. Additionally, there is value in looking back at what could be considered the use of more ‘classic’ platforms, such as blogs, forums, tumblr, and YouTube, as well as regionally-specific platforms with different governance structures outside of the Silicon Valley bubble (Zhang & de Seta, 2018). How these platforms are used by influencers to create content that is uploaded to their social media accounts to attract attention and engagement from a large network of followers is of interest due to the idiosyncratic nature of each.

Influencers are considered to be a powerful marketing resource due to their perceived credibility, authenticity and relatability (Abidin, 2015a; Djafarova & Rushworth, 2017; Pöyry et al., 2019). Marketers have capitalised on the popularity of influencers, turning to them as trusted tastemakers to endorse products and brands to their followers (De Veirman et al., 2017), thereby monetising their following (Abidin, 2016a, 2016b). Consequently, much attention has been paid to how brands can profit from influencers, including enhanced brand awareness and purchase intentions (Hughes et al., 2019; Ki & Kim, 2019; Lou & Yuan 2019; Martínez-López et al., 2020; Reinikainen et al., 2020).

Less explored in this ‘demotic turn’ (Turner, 2010) of ordinary people becoming increasingly visible in marketing are more socio-cultural and interdisciplinary approaches to the phenomenon of influencer marketing. Influencer marketing has been heralded as a democratising force, giving power to ‘real’, authentic voices (Childers et al., 2018; Duffy, 2019) across an array of contextual lifestyle boundaries, such as food, fashion, family, technology, politics, activism, health, hobbies and even pets. Yet, the commodification and monetisation of private lives raises new questions for power, privilege, appropriation and resistance in a content-driven culture (Khamis et al., 2017; Raun, 2018; Tufekci, 2017). Influencers act as carriers of taste regimes (Viotto et al., 2020), engaging in work that is laborious yet often unpaid (Duffy, 2017; Mangan, 2020; Terranova, 2000) and marked by structural inequities including gender (Drenten et al.,), race (Abidin, 2019; Lawson, 2020), religion (Beta, 2019), sexuality (Aziz, 2018; Duguay, 2019; Lana, 2018), class (Abidin, 2016a; Iqani, 2019), and national norms (Limkangvanmongkol & Abidin 2018).

Inequalities and complexities within the influencer industry are further compounded by the underlying digital dynamics of platforms, algorithms, and affordances (Bishop, 2020; Bliss, 2020; Bucher & Helmond, 2018; Cotter, 2018; Noble, 2018; O’Meara, 2019). Emerging language forms and communication norms, such as emojis, memes, filters, hashtags, animated stickers and GIFs, are increasingly interwoven into influencer-consumer interactions and consequently are shifting marketing rhetoric (de Seta, 2018; Ge & Gretzel, 2018; Gurrieri & Drenten, 2018; Shifman, 2014). Influencer cultures and practices are also broadening across the age spectrum, including child influencers (Abidin 2015b, 2017; Pedersen & Aspevig 2018) and elderly influencers (Moon & Abidin, 2020), and negotiating post-human possibilities including pet influencers (Hutchinson 2014) and virtual influencers (Marwick, 2018). The global evolution of influencer marketing gives rise to new ethical and regulatory debates around consumer vulnerabilities and deception, such as the importance of disclosure (Abidin et al. 2020; Kay et al., 2020) as consumers are unable to easily decipher what constitutes sponsored and non-sponsored content (Campbell & Grimm, 2019).

Despite the growing role of influencer marketing in practice, much of the critical scholarship exploring influencer culture is situated outside of the marketing domain. With these kinds of ideas and challenges in mind, the objective of this special issue is to discuss, problematise and stimulate debate on how influencer marketing, its consumption and wider implications for the contemporary world can be examined and re-thought from socio-cultural and interdisciplinary perspectives. Submissions are encouraged to harness methodologies that seek deep understanding and rich insights on the production, consumption, and lived experiences of influencer marketing. Transdisciplinary empirical, conceptual and theoretical contributions are invited on (but not limited to) the following topics:

  • Defining ‘influencer marketing’ and its theoretical distinctions relative to existing concepts (e.g., celebrity sponsorship, content creation)
  • Intersections of race, gender, class, age, sexuality, religion, and ability in influencer marketing and critical social justice issues
  • Amplifying the voices of Global South scholars and perspectives
  • Consideration of a more diverse scale of influencers, including nano, micro, meso, macro and mega
  • The consumption of influencer marketing and related implications for identity construction and navigation
  • The commercialisation and monetisation of private lives (e.g., family, childhood, sexuality) and related ethical considerations, including the rise of the child influencer
  • The emerging category of post-human influencers, including pet influencers, virtual influencers, and inanimate objects as influencers
  • Socio-technical assemblages, artifacts and digital materiality within influencer marketing
  • Influencer-consumer interactions, communication norms, and parasocial relationships
  • Influencer-influencer interactions, collectives and communities (e.g., collabs)
  • Advances in innovative digital research methods to examine the contours of influencer marketing
  • Dynamics and tensions of labour structures in the field of influencer marketing
  • Professionalisation and legitimisation of the influencer industry
  • Cross-cultural perspectives of influencer marketing in a global economy with porous borders
  • Cultural production of ‘drama’ and crisis management in influencer marketing

Submission Requirements:
Authors should submit manuscripts of between 8,000–10,000 words (excluding tables, references, captions, footnotes and endnotes). All submissions must strictly follow the guidelines for the Journal of Marketing Management. These are available at:

Manuscripts should be submitted online using the Journal of Marketing Management ScholarOne Manuscripts site ( New users should first create an account. Once a user is logged onto the site submissions should be made via the Author Centre. Authors should prepare and upload two versions of their manuscript. One should be a complete text, while in the second all document information identifying the author should be removed from the files to allow them to be sent anonymously to referees. When uploading files authors will then be able to define the non-anonymous version as “Complete paper with author details”, and the anonymous version as “Main document minus author information”. To submit your manuscript to the Special Issue choose “Special Issue Article” from the Manuscript Type list when you come to submit your paper. Also, when you come to the ‘Details and Comments’ page, answer ‘yes’ to the question ‘Is this manuscript a candidate for a special issue’ and select the Special Issue Title of Influencer Marketing in the text field provided.

Inquiries regarding guest editors’ expectations, the suitability of specific research topics, and/or submission deadlines should be directed to the Special Issue Editors:

Dr. Lauren Gurrieri (
Dr. Jenna Drenten (
Dr. Crystal Abidin (

The closing date for submissions was 1 September 2021.

Technical queries about submissions can be referred to the Editorial Office:


Abidin, C. (2014). #In$tagLam: Instagram as a repository of taste, a brimming marketplace, a war of eyeballs. In M. Berry & M. Schleser (Eds.), Mobile Media Making in the Age of Smartphones (pp. 119–128). Palgrave Pivot.
Abidin, C. (2015a). Communicative Intimacies: Influencers and Perceived Interconnectedness. Ada, 8, 1–16.
Abidin, C. (2015b). Micro-microcelebrity: Branding babies on the Internet. M/C Journal 18(5).
Abidin, C. (2016a). “Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–17.
Abidin, C. (2016b). Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on instagram. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 161(1), 86–100.
Abidin, C. (2017). #familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labour. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–15.
Abidin, C. (2019). Minahs and Minority Celebrity: Parody YouTube Influencers and Minority Politics in Singapore. [Online first]. Celebrity Studies, 1–20.
Abidin, C., Hansen, K., Hogsnes, M., Newlands, G., Nielsen, M. L., Nielsen, L. Y., & Sihvonen, T. (2020). A Review of Formal and Informal Regulations in the Nordic Influencer Industry. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 2(1), 71–83.
Aziz, F. (2018). Performing as a Transgressive Authentic Microcelebrity: The Qandeel Baloch Case. In C. Abidin & M. L. Brown (Eds.), Microcelebrity Around the Globe: Approaches to cultures of internet fame (pp. 131–143). Emerald Publishing.,
Beta, A. R. (2019). Commerce, piety and politics: Indonesian young Muslim women’s groups as religious influencers. New Media & Society, 21(10), 2140–2159.
Bishop, S. (2020). Algorithmic Experts: Selling Algorithmic Lore on YouTube. Social Media + Society, 6(1).
Bliss, M. (2020). Under the radar: Older women YouTubers and algorithmic influence. Feminist Media Studies, 20(5), 745-747.
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (pp. 233–253). Sage Publications.
Business Insider (2019). Influencer Marketing: State of the social media influencer market in 2020.
Campana, M., Van den Bossche, A., & Miller, B. (2020). #dadtribe: Performing Sharenting Labour to Commercialise Involved Fatherhood. Journal of Macromarketing.
Campbell, C., & Grimm, P. (2019). The Challenges Native Advertising Poses: Exploring Potential Federal Trade Commission Responses and Identifying Research Needs. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38(1), 110–123.
Childers, C., Lemon, L., & Hoy, M. (2019). Sponsored #Ad: Agency Perspective on Influencer Marketing Campaigns. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 40(3), 258–274.
Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913.
de Seta, G. (2018). Biaoqing: The circulation of emoticons, emoji, stickers, and custom images on Chinese digital media platforms. First Monday, 23(9).
De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828.
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7.
Drenten, J., Gurrieri, L., & Tyler, M. (2020). Sexualized labour in digital culture: Instagram influencers, porn chic and the monetization of attention. Gender, Work and Organization, 27(1), 41–66.
Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. Yale University Press.
Duffy, B. (2019). Dreamjob: The Promises and Perils of a Creative Career in Social Media. In D. Mark & P. Mirjam (Eds.), Making Media: Production, Practices, and Professions (pp. 375–386). Amsterdam University Press.
Duguay, S. (2019). “Running the Numbers”: Modes of Microcelebrity Labor in Queer Women’s Self-Representation on Instagram and Vine. Social Media + Society, 5(4).
Ge, J., & Gretzel, U. (2018). Emoji rhetoric: A social media influencer perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(15-16), 1272–1295.
Gurrieri, L., & Drenten, J. (2019). The hashtaggable body: Negotiating gender performance in social media. In S. Dobscha (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Marketing (pp. 101–116). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Hughes, C., Swaminathan, V., & Brooks, G. (2019). Driving Brand Engagement Through Online Social Influencers: An Empirical Investigation of Sponsored Blogging Campaigns. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 78–96.
Hutchinson, J. (2014). I Can Haz Likes: Cultural Intermediation to Facilitate ‘Petworking’. M/C Journal, 17(2).
Iqani, M. (2019). Picturing luxury, producing value: The cultural labour of social media brand influencers in South Africa. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(2), 229–247.
Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: The impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), 248–278.
Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2017). Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of Social Media Influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8(2), 191–208.
Ki, C.-W., & Kim, Y.-K. (2019). The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology and Marketing, 36(10), 905–922.
Lana, L. (2018). Catarina, a Virgin for Auction: Microcelebrity in Brazilian Media. In C. Abidin & M. L. Brown (Eds.), Microcelebrity Around the Globe: Approaches to cultures of internet fame (pp. 107–117). Emerald Publishing.,
Lawson, C. E. (2020). Skin deep: Callout strategies, influencers, and racism in the online beauty community. New Media & Society.
Limkangvanmongkol, V., & Abidin, C. (2018). Net idols and beauty bloggers’ negotiations of race, commerce, and cultural customs: Emergent microcelebrity genres in Thailand. In C. Abidin & M. L. Brown (Eds.), Microcelebrity Around the Globe: Approaches to cultures of internet fame (pp. 95–106). Emerald Publishing.
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer Marketing: How Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73.
Martínez-López, F., Anaya-Sánchez, R., Fernández Giordano, M., & Lopez-Lopez, D. (2020). Behind influencer marketing: Key marketing decisions and their effects on followers’ responses. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(7-8), 579–607.
Mangan, D. (2020). Influencer marketing as labour: between the public and private divide. In C. Goanta & S. Ranchordas (Eds.), The Regulation of Social Media Influencers (pp. 185–208). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Marwick, A. E. (2018). The Algorithmic Celebrity: The Future of Internet Fame and Microcelebrity Studies. In C. Abidin & M. L. Brown (Eds.), Microcelebrity Around the Globe: Approaches to cultures of internet fame (pp. 161–169). Emerald Publishing.
McQuarrie, E., Miller, J., & Phillips, B. (2013). The Megaphone Effect: Taste and Audience in Fashion Blogging. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 136–158.
Moon, J., & Abidin, C. (2020). Online Ajumma: Self-presentations of contemporary elderly women via digital media in Korea. In K. Warfield, C. Abidin, & C. Cambre (Eds.), Mediated Interfaces: The Body on Social Media. Bloomsbury Academic.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression. NYU Press.
O’Meara, V. (2019). Weapons of the Chic: Instagram Influencer Engagement Pods as Practices of Resistance to Instagram Platform Labor. Social Media + Society, 5(4).
Pedersen, I., & Aspevig, K. (2018). Being Jacob: Young Children, Automated Subjectivity, and Child Social Media Influencers. M/C Journal, 21(2).
Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S.-M. (2019). A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 336–351.
Raun, T. (2018). Capitalizing intimacy. Convergence (London), 24(1), 99–113.
Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’ – parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), 279–298.
Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.
Terranova, T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary People and the Media. Sage Publications.
Viotto, M., Zanette, M., & Brito, E. (2020). Looking good or feeling good? The dual role of the body in the taste transformation process. Consumption Markets & Culture, 1–21.
Zhang, G., & de Seta, G. (2018). Being ‘Red’ on the Internet: The craft of popularity on Chinese Social Media Platforms. In C. Abidin & M. L. Brown (Eds.), Microcelebrity Around the Globe: Approaches to cultures of internet fame (pp. 57–67). Emerald Publishing.,

This post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, unless otherwise stated. Third party materials remain the copyright of the original rightsholder.